![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Meg's all yours, Auror Lestrange. I'm confident you can ensure some 'permanent damage.' She might be useful later as an object lesson but it's probably not worth the trouble to keep her alive. (It largely depends on whether we care if word gets around that the damage was from MLE, not from some mysterious curse cast by the Dogstar traitors. St Mungo's will certain know the difference. Do we have a secure ward of trustworthy Healers? They leaked like a sieve during the epidemic.)
Barty -- we've established they are at least reading the journal, but they're more than willing to turn their backs on members who get captured, at least low-level members. We should talk about whether we want to share the code name Auror Lestrange learned -- someone might have heard it used, but on the other hand, it might give them a certain glamour we'd rather avoid.
Barty -- we've established they are at least reading the journal, but they're more than willing to turn their backs on members who get captured, at least low-level members. We should talk about whether we want to share the code name Auror Lestrange learned -- someone might have heard it used, but on the other hand, it might give them a certain glamour we'd rather avoid.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-05 05:35 am (UTC)I suggest we keep the code name Procyon to ourselves. It will tell us more when we do run across it, and in the meantime, we'll avoid spawning imitators and admirers. Besides, the recruitment system we've discovered is sophisticated and subtle enough that I doubt publishing the name would lure any informants. I'm not convinced that many of Procyon's conquests know that they know his name. We know to probe for it now, however, and that may pay rich benefits one day.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: