I don't know if you've checked the student journals, but it does appear that the end-of-act curtain did fall more than a little prematurely, and the Matron retrieved from the audience because the lass playing Alecto Carrow urgently needed her attentions.
I'm not sure what they're planning for a second act. They should probably just call it a day, at this point; if they succeed in topping the first act it will doubtless mean catastrophe!
Arista is fascinated, of course.
I'm not sure what they're planning for a second act. They should probably just call it a day, at this point; if they succeed in topping the first act it will doubtless mean catastrophe!
Arista is fascinated, of course.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 02:10 am (UTC)You were a little late coming back with Arista; Pansy announced before raising the curtain again that Miss Perks will play Alecto for the remainder of the evening.
Arista is not the only one. At this point, I expect nothing less than Shakespearean tragedy, with traitorous bodies littering the stage and gouts of blood spattering the first three rows.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 02:26 am (UTC)You don't think they're having a little laugh at Miss Parkinson's expense, since Alecto was replaced and now Tony's no longer on the scene?
Private Message to Narcissa
Date: 2011-04-17 02:34 am (UTC)Merlin. Alice Pendelton Longbottom - there's a sorry sight indeed.
Re: Private Message to Narcissa
Date: 2011-04-17 02:39 am (UTC)I can't imagine duelling in that condition. Nor having a husband who'd put me in harm's way like that.
But then Frank Longbottom - he always was a selfish brute.
Re: Private Message to Narcissa
Date: 2011-04-17 02:45 am (UTC)I don't ... AH. HAH. Where's the playbill?
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 02:46 am (UTC)And it's Weasley's youngest boy, to boot!
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 03:14 am (UTC)Do you suppose he was supposed to sprint around the stage like that? I rather got the feeling the snake expected to catch him on the first go-round.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 03:23 am (UTC)And no - I strongly suspect it was a case of the Weasley boy not following his instructions. A Weasley making a cake of himself: Surprise, surprise.
Haven't laughed this hard since - well, since Barty's birthday, I think.
I think we ought to present Dolores with a mad cat, don't you?
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 03:26 am (UTC)It appears the Weasley boy's sister is furious -- probably because he got more laughs than she did. She wasn't terrible, but she didn't get the ovation he did!
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 03:31 am (UTC)Oh, yes. The sister. Isn't she the one who tried to be re-Sorted into Slytherin last year? Yes, I'm sure. You wouldn't have even seen it; not sure it even made a footnote in that month's minutes.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 03:35 am (UTC)You're not serious!
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 03:41 am (UTC)Except - perhaps - the middle boy. Percival.
Massopust oversees the eldest one, doesn't he? I seem to recall he had some objections about that Weasley as well. Or do I mis-remember?
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 03:50 am (UTC)Percival -- you mean the Head Boy? He does seem to have risen above the worst tendencies of his family. Perhaps the girl will too, in time. But Slytherin! Ha. Imagine her rooming with Hydra Lestrange. No, I agree, she was clearly born a Gryffindor whether she likes it or not.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 04:00 am (UTC)But then perhaps he shows you a different face.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 04:06 am (UTC)Besides, their blood may be pure but their opinions are .... Well, 'unreliable' is perhaps a good way to put it. Of them all, he's the most likely to provide a glimpse of what is truly being said under their dilapidated and leaking roof.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 04:15 am (UTC)My dear, we ought to stop amusing Dominic with our assessment of Hogwarts' Head Boy and let him return to more important matters.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-17 04:17 am (UTC)You may well be on to something there.